It is currently Tue Dec 06, 2022 10:15 am

All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:42 am 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:16 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Denver
Normally I wouldn't create a post about a controversial subject like politics.. but I am so out raged, disgusted and quite frankly scared of what has become of the world.. I just need to share some things with you all. You may or may not have heard about it, or the details still remain unclear because mainstream news outlets in America are doing their best to put a feel-good spin on it. But, on September 27th, 2006, The Military Comissions Act of 2006 was passed in the House of Congress. This Bill allows the administration to arrest and lock up any person it desires including US Citizens without due process. This means that if passed by the Senate, absolutely ANYONE is free game to arrest, throw in a military prison and torture if they so desire. The Bill goes out of it's way to gut the blatantly articulated provisions of the Geneva Convention. The President has no obligation to file charges or even provide evidence of guilt in any case.

Any person with a Non-Allegiance to Bush is considered an "enemy combatant" or a Terrorist under this Bill and are dealt with accordingly. For an individual to hold an allegiance or duty to the United States they need to be a citizen of the United States. Why would a foreign terrorist have any allegiance to the United States to breach in the first place?

Here is the Section in question.
Quote:
Subsection 4(b) (26) of section 950v. of HR 6166 - Crimes triable by military commissions - includes the following definition.

"Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct."




When is the line going to be crossed? Is there even a line in today's society? I'm positive that had a Bill like this even been presented to Congress 20 years ago, a nationwide protest would have taken place. It's amazing to me that stripping this nation of it's civil liberties, freedoms, and human rights is now an effortless task. This Bill passed Congress without even the slightest whimper.

The Bill in it's entirety can be found at - http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.6166:

_________________

View Tribes Ascend stats for CynageN.
"Competition is natural to the ignorant; and cooperation is natural to the wise." - Manly Hall


Last edited by CynageN on Sun Oct 01, 2006 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:02 pm 
Offline
Dawg medium
Dawg medium
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:32 pm
Posts: 652
Location: Newberg Oregon
for the record he didn't get my vote both times

_________________
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 2:07 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 12:09 pm
Posts: 4715
Location: Milky_Way\Earth\USA\PA\Philly!
You realise we are talking about terrorists, not prankstars but terrorists. I'm not a fan of our administration but like it or not there's a world wide hornets nest of these losers and they want a piece of the United States. I don't agree with the bill that was passed, but the quote does say "knowingly and intentionally" aids an enemy of the United States. I don't think they'll lock up a sales clerk that sold a stick of RAM to a terrorist at a Best Buy.

However if you are in communication with them, purchase or help them into our country, clothe or feed them or assist them in locating, targetting and destroying their objectives... then you are an enemy of our nation and deserve to be punished. Like that idiot kid that when to Afghanistan and joined the terrorist organization, and fired at U.S. military. I have no sympathy or compassion for traitors. If a U.S. citizen is involved he/she derserves legal representation, foreigners should contact their embassy and beg for help, that's all.

_________________
"Down with democracy... we need more dictatorships"! Galamoth :D
"Derms, celebrate your independance"! Babz :P
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 2:26 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:16 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Denver
The President is not required to file charges or provide any proof of guilt of any one they detain under this bill. It means that innocent until proven guilty is no longer part of the picture. It means that Bush gets to call the shots on who exactly is an enemy of the nation, and no one else has a say.

No one deserves to be tortured. If you think for a second that all this means is the evil terrorists they detain get a little cold water thrown in their face, or a little loud music played for them, you are fooling yourself. We're talking about the same administration that is trying to pass a bill that ALLOWS the torture of all people the president deems an enemy. These people could be just as innocent as you or I and it would not matter as due process isn't required when the administration is involved. If the credentials for their detainees were so important, they would not need to throw out due process because any one they detained that fit the description of a terrorist would be clear cut.

I hate to ignore godwin's law here, but this Bill is almost uncanny to what Nazi Germany was founded upon. You do not question the administration, as the administration is above the law.

_________________

View Tribes Ascend stats for CynageN.
"Competition is natural to the ignorant; and cooperation is natural to the wise." - Manly Hall


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 2:42 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 12:09 pm
Posts: 4715
Location: Milky_Way\Earth\USA\PA\Philly!
Are we reading the same bill.

Sec. 948d. Jurisdiction of military commissions

`(a) Jurisdiction- A military commission under this chapter shall have jurisdiction to try any offense made punishable by this chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful enemy combatant before, on, or after September 11, 2001.

`(b) Lawful Enemy Combatants- Military commissions under this chapter shall not have jurisdiction over lawful enemy combatants. Lawful enemy combatants who violate the law of war are subject to chapter 47 of this title. Courts-martial established under that chapter shall have jurisdiction to try a lawful enemy combatant for any offense made punishable under this chapter.

`(c) Determination of Unlawful Enemy Combatant Status Dispositive- A finding, whether before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the President or the Secretary of Defense that a person is an unlawful enemy combatant is dispositive for purposes of jurisdiction for trial by military commission under this chapter.

`(d) Punishments- A military commission under this chapter may, under such limitations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter, including the penalty of death when authorized under this chapter or the law of war.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven't seen anything that gives the President the authority to have anyone picked-up and thrown in jail using this bill as justification. This bill talks of tribunals, I believe this bill is written for the battlefield or possibly for raids conducted on foreign soil, not our nation.

_________________
"Down with democracy... we need more dictatorships"! Galamoth :D
"Derms, celebrate your independance"! Babz :P
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 2:49 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:16 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Denver
Quote:
This bill talks of tribunals, I believe this bill is written for the battlefield or possibly for raids conducted on foreign soil, not our nation.
Really? Then where is the part where it says US Citizens are not to be detained under this bill? Even Citizens that have never left the country?
Quote:
The bill also allows hearsay evidence (obtained via phony confessions after torture) to be considered by the military tribunal and bars the suspect from even having knowledge of the charges against him - making a case for defense impossible. This is guaranteed to produce 100% conviction rates as you would expect in the dictatorships of Uzbekistan or Zimbabwe and other torture protagonists who are in many cases allied with the Bush administration and provide phony confessions obtained from torture that allow the U.S. government to scare its people with the threat of imaginary Al-Qaeda terror cells waiting to kill them.
Check out http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/2 ... -becoming/

We all know that an innocent man tries to grant himself immunity from crimes he has never done in the first place! :roll:

_________________

View Tribes Ascend stats for CynageN.
"Competition is natural to the ignorant; and cooperation is natural to the wise." - Manly Hall


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:58 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 12:09 pm
Posts: 4715
Location: Milky_Way\Earth\USA\PA\Philly!
Hmmm, after reading through the bill and looking at the last link you provided. I would be VERY concerned about my personal civil liberties and rights if "marshall law" was declared on U. S. soil!

The government is given free reign to do whatever they want to whomever they want for as long as they want.

_________________
"Down with democracy... we need more dictatorships"! Galamoth :D
"Derms, celebrate your independance"! Babz :P
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:11 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:16 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Denver
We're one "terrorist attack" away.

_________________

View Tribes Ascend stats for CynageN.
"Competition is natural to the ignorant; and cooperation is natural to the wise." - Manly Hall


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:14 pm 
Offline
Old Dawg
Old Dawg
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 4:18 pm
Posts: 1293
Location: Preferably in front of a computer
The last quote by you, Cynagen, leaves me with ambivalent feelings. True, it can or possibly would infringe upon our civil liberties as US citizens. But that last bit you mentioned, it sounds like this guy is saying that Al Qaeda doesn't really exist, or that it cannot hurt us. And that we are willingly allying ourselves with dictatorships with oppresive regimes.


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:16 pm 
Offline
Old Dawg
Old Dawg

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 11:39 pm
Posts: 1646
Location: Twin Cities, MN.
Thanks for sharing Cyn. Good comments from both you and Dunna. Please contact your congressman/woman and provide feedback accordingly. Join or organize protests if you are compelled to do so.

Keep the comments light here and stick to the facts. Remember that interpertation of such legislation is inherrently difficult. Right or wrong, that is why we have courts and lawyers (yes, this is a entire different topic!).

Discussion here may continue provided it is not a debate platform, since this forum is not for debate of politics, religion, or other such topics.
Moose

_________________
--> Born in 1972 and unable to PM or post without an editorial review, :roll:! <--

Image
No moose hunting without a license :P! Licensing fees available by request :moo.
Why hunt moose anyway? We're just big, slow, dumb, and make for easy kills...oops.
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:23 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:16 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Denver
Quote:
The last quote by you, Cynagen, leaves me with ambivalent feelings. True, it can or possibly would infringe upon our civil liberties as US citizens. But that last bit you mentioned, it sounds like this guy is saying that Al Qaeda doesn't really exist, or that it cannot hurt us. And that we are willingly allying ourselves with dictatorships with oppresive regimes.
It's for another discussion I suppose. I will say that I wouldn't use the word "we".

_________________

View Tribes Ascend stats for CynageN.
"Competition is natural to the ignorant; and cooperation is natural to the wise." - Manly Hall


Last edited by CynageN on Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 4:25 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:16 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Denver
I'm really not trying to spur debate here, I'm just genuinely scared for the future of this country for the first time. I never in my wildest dreams thought that the US would be a country to condone and use torture on anyone, let alone it's "enemies". Add on top of that the fact that they don't even need evidence of any crime commited by said enemy.

_________________

View Tribes Ascend stats for CynageN.
"Competition is natural to the ignorant; and cooperation is natural to the wise." - Manly Hall


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 7:05 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 698
Location: Music City
Quote:
Hmmm, after reading through the bill and looking at the last link you provided. I would be VERY concerned about my personal civil liberties and rights if "marshall law" was declared on U. S. soil!
Depending on the outcome of the next presidential election, I have a feeling marshal law will be declared before the newly elected president is sworn in.

_________________
Image
Image
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:56 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 12:09 pm
Posts: 4715
Location: Milky_Way\Earth\USA\PA\Philly!
SHAZBOT!

_________________
"Down with democracy... we need more dictatorships"! Galamoth :D
"Derms, celebrate your independance"! Babz :P
Image


Top
   
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:15 pm 
Offline
Council Member
Council Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 12:34 pm
Posts: 538
Protection vs. Civil Liberty debate's are interesting. Cyn - your concern is justified, and I'm glad that we have a good base of skeptics to watch out for our personal liberties, but it is merely a fear; a "what if" scenario. Your concern is that this bill might somehow provide justification for the government to arrest citizens "without cause", to imprison them, and have their way with them. Well, "citizens" have families, friends, support groups, work associates, histories, and the always present media to keep the government in check. If the government were to suddenly go "Stalin" on us it would be a public event and the people would rise up; Ya see . . . the military is made of regular ole blokes just like you and I - good people who love freedom.

I don't believe the government is passing legislation to take away our Civil Liberties. I believe the government is passing legislation to "Protect" our Civil Liberties. First and foremost among those Liberties; The right to live. Terrorists are all over the place. They don't wear uniforms, they don't have a country of residence, they don't abide by our rules, they don't have a Geneva Convention, they do want to kill us, they do hate our freedom, they do despise religion that is not theirs, and there are some here in the United States.

I also believe that these terrorists are seeking a way to obtain and use chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons against us. I'd like to get this information out of them before they bring the weapons to my front door. I think the government has to have methods, ways, and means to accomplish this task. I'm glad there are guidelines to help us stay civil and to help us be better then our enemies. If you can think of a more peaceful way to extract information from enemies that are seeking to kill us I'm sure that the government would want to hear what you have to say.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited